A new concept of the iPhone 5 comes directly from Italy and was envisioned by Antonio De Rosa, founder of ADR Studio. The handset appears in De Rosa’s vision with a slightly larger screen and the firm’s logo inlaid on top of the screen. The device integrates the A6 processor with a target of 10 million pixels for the camera. There are no real changes in the volume buttons. However, the location of the SIM card was changed as it appears on the top edge of the iPhone. The display is envisioned by De Rosa as edge-to-edge and it’s a “totally glass capacitive screen on a polycarbonate lightweight body.” The author of the concept called it the iPhone SJ, in memory of Steve Jobs. Do you like this concept of the iPhone 5 or not? Leave your comments.
A new concept of the iPhone 5 comes directly from Italy and was envisioned by Antonio De Rosa, founder of ADR Studio.
The handset appears in De Rosa’s vision with a slightly larger screen and the firm’s logo inlaid on top of the screen.
The device integrates the A6 processor with a target of 10 million pixels for the camera.
There are no real changes in the volume buttons. However, the location of the SIM card was changed as it appears on the top edge of the iPhone.
The display is envisioned by De Rosa as edge-to-edge and it’s a “totally glass capacitive screen on a polycarbonate lightweight body.”
The author of the concept called it the iPhone SJ, in memory of Steve Jobs.
Do you like this concept of the iPhone 5 or not? Leave your comments.
Over the last few days there has been plenty of talk regarding the next generation iPad, but there seem to be only whispers about the next generation iPhone. As far as the design of the next iPhone, we don’t have much more than leaked “iPhone 5″ cases that appeared online prior to the iPhone 4S launch. While the leaked iPhone 5 cases seem to resemble the iPad 2, some people have a much different idea of what the next generation iPhone could look like.
Designer Antonio De Rosa has created this beautiful “iPhone SJ” mockup, which he states is “inspired by Steve Jobs.”
Totally glass capacitive screen on a polycarbonate lightweight body.
New design inspired by Steve Jobs, new core with A6 dual core processor, new camera 10 Mpx (sic).
A classic reinvented. Again.
I think this is a gorgeous vision of what the next iPhone could look like, but it seems unlikely to me. If Apple’s launch-redesign-upgrade-redesign-upgrade way of dishing out iDevices has taught us anything, it’s pretty much a given that the next iPhone will feature a new quad-core processor (A6?) and if we’re lucky, a 10 megapixel camera. The polycarbonate back in De Rosa’s design just looks too similar to the current iPhone models to be considered a redesign, in my opinion. Departing from the glass back of the iPhone 4/4S would be a necessary change to be considered “new” (think: iPhone 3GS to iPhone 4) and would give the iPhone a look like that of the iPad 2. Other than that, there isn’t much to fuel the fire of speculation.
What do you think of this design? Would you like the next iPhone to be even thinner than the iPhone 4S? Do you think glass or metal would be better for the back? Be sure to let us know in the comments!
According to 9to5Mac, the next generations of iPhone and iPad could be equipped with a quad-core processor instead of what can be found today in the iPhone 4S and iPad 2. Delving into the internal files of the latest beta version of iOS 5.1, the team found a reference to a Quad-Core processor in the software. The report cited an “extremely reliable and knowledgeable people familiar with iOS’s inner workings,” explaining that references to quad-core iPhone and iPad chips were found in “a hidden panel that describes cores that are supported by iOS device hardware.” The number 0 indicates the presence of a core (the A4 chip), then the number 1 that of two cores (the A5 chip in the second image), and 3 points point to the possibility of using four cores. The fact that this future processor is quad-core is still speculation but the site 9to5Mac suggests that the elements present in iOS 5.1 Beta attest to the management of such a gadget. A quad-core processor will add extra power for gaming and global navigation. [Photo: 9to5mac.com]
According to 9to5Mac, the next generations of iPhone and iPad could be equipped with a quad-core processor instead of what can be found today in the iPhone 4S and iPad 2.
Delving into the internal files of the latest beta version of iOS 5.1, the team found a reference to a Quad-Core processor in the software.
The report cited an “extremely reliable and knowledgeable people familiar with iOS’s inner workings,” explaining that references to quad-core iPhone and iPad chips were found in “a hidden panel that describes cores that are supported by iOS device hardware.”
The number 0 indicates the presence of a core (the A4 chip), then the number 1 that of two cores (the A5 chip in the second image), and 3 points point to the possibility of using four cores.
The fact that this future processor is quad-core is still speculation but the site 9to5Mac suggests that the elements present in iOS 5.1 Beta attest to the management of such a gadget.
A quad-core processor will add extra power for gaming and global navigation.
Obsessive-compulsive, passionate, editor-in-chief. Boy Genius.
I am almost shocked that I feel this way, but I’m starting to get a little weepy for our country’s wireless carriers. In a sense, they are the unsung heroes of our untethered telephony experience, laying out huge sums to build the latest in high-speed mobile networks — and incurring massive debt in the process.
Yes, I know, when I look at my wireless bill every month, I, too, think that these guys must be making money hand over fist. But consider this: In 2010, the wireless industry spent $24.9 billion investing in infrastructure, according to the CTIA, an industry trade organization. But only two carriers were able to reap more from their network capital expenditures than the cost for that capital, according to Bernstein Research. It’s probably no surprise that those companies are ATT (NYS: T) and Verizon (NYS: VZ) . That leaves Sprint Nextel (NYS: S) , T-Mobile, MetroPCS, Leap (NAS: LEAP) , U.S. Cellular, and the rest wondering whether their efforts will ever get rewarded.
But even the profitable carriers are watching their margins getting shaved quarter after quarter, and though they know exactly where the money is going, they are powerless to plug the leak. Why? Because it happens to be caused by their single biggest marketing tool — the iPhone.
Let’s look at Verizon’s iProblem. This week, the company announced that it sold 4.2 million iPhones in the fourth quarter, more than twice as many as in the previous quarter. Yet the company’s profit margins dropped 5% quarter to quarter.
ATT is not immune to this phenomenon. According to The Wall Street Journal, analysts predicted that the carrier’s wireless profit margins for the fourth quarter would fall to a four-year low, even though ATT said it would sell a record number of iPhones and other smartphones during that period.
Nomura Securities analyst Michael McCormack told the WSJ that ATT’s relationship with the iPhone has “really been a wealth transfer from ATT shareholders to Apple shareholders.”
But the iPhone is such a draw that carriers are willing to subsidize an estimated $400 of its purchase price each time a subscriber signs a two-year contract, hoping that customer will stick around.
Sprint was so desperate to get into the iPhone club, it agreed to buy $15.5 billion worth of the phones from Apple (NAS: AAPL) — even if it can’t sell them all. One could argue that without the iPhone, the No. 3 carrier would never have a chance of competing with the top two carriers. But on the other hand, such a commitment could doom the company anyway.
And here’s another conundrum that comes with the iPhone, as well as every other smartphone: how to charge for data usage.
Smartphones have created an increased demand on the carriers’ networks to provide enough bandwidth for all the downloading and streaming to and from our mobile devices. But the iPhone 4S causes the biggest downdraft out there, and it’s only slightly behind the HTC Desire S for gobbling up data, according to a study just published by Arieso.
To add to the carriers’ data problem, the Arieso study also pointed out that 50% of all downlinking is done by only 1% of users. So the question is what to do about those little piggies. The Dow Jones Newswires reported that Sprint CEO Dan Hesse told an investor conference that the company deals with overly prolific downloaders by strangling their data bandwidth. So Sprint’s solution is to be disingenuous about its advertised unlimited data plans. ATT and Verizon deal with heavy data users by charging them more through a tiered pricing structure.
Is the tail wagging the dog?
If the iPhone makes it even harder for the wireless carriers to turn a profit, then why have it? T-Mobile may provide that answer. It doesn’t carry the iPhone, and it lost 850,000 contract customers through September. Now, some of that may have been caused by other factors, such as theuncertainty over the merger with ATT, but lack of the iPhone certainly didn’t help.
I also can’t help wondering what would happen if Sprint can’t pay Apple for all those iPhones. Would Apple then take over Sprint and run its own mobile network? I love my iPhone, but I don’t think that would be a good idea.
ATT and Verizon have both been steady income payers for years. It would be a sad day if their profit margins should slip enough to force a decrease in dividend payouts. For some leads on other solid income producing stocks, please help yourself to this special free report from The Motley Fool.
At the time this
article was published Fool contributor Dan Radovsky owns shares of ATT. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of and creating a bull call spread position in Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 – 2012 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
But the new year is just as much a time to look forward. Every January we also survey a number of Macworld contributors and friends for their predictions for the upcoming 12 months. Specifically, we ask our participants for their forecasts for Mac OS X, iOS and Apple hardware, as well as for each person’s pie-in-the-sky wish for the world of Apple. You’ll find such hopes and wishes below.
Jacqui Cheng, Senior Apple Editor, Ars Technica
Mac OS X: My OS X-related prediction from last year – integrated cloud services – ended up coming true, so why not keep running with that? This year, I hope to see even further integration with cloud and internet services. An obvious example is iMessage on the desktop (who doesn’t want that?), but I’m also thinking bigger, like the capability to set up a new Mac from a cloud-based backup or, at the very least, from your Time Machine backup at home while you’re out and about.
iOS: Siri made a splash when it debuted with the iPhone 4S, and I’d like to see Apple open up the Siri API to third-party developers. She (it?) already works reasonably well with Apple’s own apps and services; wouldn’t it be nice to be able to use Siri with your favourite third-party apps?
We may also finally see the end result of all these recent – and mysterious – mapping-related acquisitions Apple has been making. What is Apple doing with Placebase, Poly9 and C3 anyway? Maybe the employees are still going through the hazing that Steve Jobs started when their respective companies were first acquired.
Hardware: We didn’t see any cosmetic changes in the iPhone in 2011, so 2012 is prime for it. What those changes will encompass is anyone’s guess, but thinner, lighter and ‘sexier’ will undoubtedly be on the checklist. More RAM and a better processor, too? Apple’s got this. Of course, this is a boring and predictable answer on hardware, but there are few things I’m more sure of than this. Want something a little crazier? Maybe Apple will even offer the 2012 iPhone in colours this time, laying waste to Colorware’s entire market. That would be enthralling, wouldn’t it?
Pie-in-the-sky wish: Apple will allow modified iOS apps to be installed on newer Apple TVs. (Modified for the TV, that is.) The company opened the door to the concept in 2011 in the form of the MLB, NBA, Vimeo and Wall Street Journal ‘channels’ (found under the internet tab), so it’s about time we started seeing other things on the big screen – Cut the Rope, hipster-styled photos on Instagram, or inappropriate Facebook messages from your high school friends. Content producers might even feel more comfortable putting their TV shows, movies and clips on the Apple TV if they can do it using their own apps. If this happens, the Apple TV will eventually blossom to become the cord-cutting haven that the cable companies have been fearing for years.
Adam Engst, Publisher, TidBITS
Mac OS X: After releasing the iOS-inspired Lion (Mac OS X 10.7) in 2011, I don’t see Apple changing much with Mac OS X – most of Lion’s changes were either low-level technologies for developers or interface changes aimed at making Mac OS X seem more like iOS for new users. That said, one area in which we could see notable movement would be an option to prevent users from installing software from any source other than the Mac App Store. That would create a platform that would be both more coherent and more secure than Mac OS X is now. And just think of the online controversy it would cause!
iOS: Time to go out on a limb right from the start: 2012 will bring the fourth major iOS device, the third-generation Apple TV. Running iOS 6, it will finally go beyond being just ‘iOS-based’ by actually allowing you to install and run iOS apps. (I’m not committing to whether this new Apple TV will be a standalone box or something built into a TV or screen, but the former seems more likely to me.) As with the original iPad, this new Apple TV will be compatible with older (non-TV-optimised) apps, but more interesting will be new Apple TV-native apps, which will use Siri-based voice control and other new methods of interacting – think of an iPod touch as a game controller, or even something like the Xbox’s Kinect. In fact, you’ll need another iOS device to control the Apple TV 3.
Hardware: Let’s see. iPad 3 with Siri, a higher-resolution display, better cameras, a faster CPU and more RAM? Check. iPhone 5 with a new industrial design, 4G LTE connectivity, better cameras, a faster CPU and more RAM? Check. Apple has maintained its lead in the tablet and smartphone markets by continually pushing the envelope, and the company can’t afford to rest on its laurels. On the Mac hardware side, it’s hard to see significant changes, though I wouldn’t be surprised to see the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro gain an option for a built-in cellular-data modem. For the iMac, Mac mini and Mac Pro, Apple will stick with processor speed bumps, larger hard disks and/or SSDs, and more RAM.
Pie-in-the-sky wish: Apple isn’t going to buy a cellular carrier, since it makes little sense for the company to learn to operate a completely different business. However, I’d really like to see Apple create a worldwide ‘mobile virtual network operator’ – industry-speak for a cellular carrier that owns no towers or spectrum licenses, but instead leases its entire infrastructure from other carriers. Apple could then sell voice and data service for all iOS devices (and my predicted cellular-capable MacBooks!) with simple, affordable pricing that would make iOS devices even more attractive than Android-based smartphones and tablets.
John Gruber, Daring Fireball
Mac OS X: I don’t expect any major Mac OS X news this year. For example, I don’t expect to hear about Mac OS X 10.8 at WWDC this year.
iOS: I think we’ll see iOS 6 in June at WWDC, on the same schedule as iOS 5 last year. I’m not sure what to predict about it specifically, though, because with the past few releases of iOS, Apple has picked off all the low-hanging fruit: copy and paste, multi-tasking, a better notification system – there’s nothing major like that missing from iOS today.
What I would like to see is SDK support for third-party apps to interact with Siri, and maybe for creating Notification Center widgets like the built-in Weather and Stocks options.
Hardware: New iPads early in 2012, including high-end models with double-resolution retina displays. I think Apple will continue selling the existing iPad 2 alongside the new ones, or introduce a new lower-end model that still sports today’s 1024 x 768-pixel screen, simply because I think the retina-display iPad will be a bit expensive. I think the new iPad models will use the same screen size as today’s – no 7in model.
I also think we’ll see a brand-new iPhone later in the year, pretty much on the same schedule as the iPhone 4S, but this time with a redesigned exterior. I don’t think we’ll see a bigger screen on the iPhone. This trend towards 4.5in and 5in displays on Android and Windows phones seems like a mistake to me – I think the iPhone needs to get smaller (especially thinner), not bigger. I also think Apple is very serious about pushing the boundaries of mobile-phone photography, so I expect to see an even better camera than the 4S’s in the next iPhone.
Finally, by this time next year, I expect the 15in MacBook Pro to look like a larger version of the current MacBook Air: thinner, lighter, SSD-only, with no optical drive. And maybe the high-end MacBooks will go retina display, doubling the pixel resolution.
Pie-in-the-sky wish: I’ll repeat my same pie-in-the-sky wish from last year: A HyperCard-like development system for iOS from Apple.
John Moltz, Editor-in-Chief, Crazy Apple Rumors
Mac OS X: Tired of languishing in iOS’s shadow, Mac OS X will rebel by getting a tattoo against Tim Cook’s expressed wishes – possibly a tribal arm band or a something edgy to show its own OS, like THUG LIFE. A furious Cook will threaten to revoke OS X’s car privileges and the whole thing will blow up at WWDC where OS X will storm off the stage, leaving Cook standing there with iOS (which the Mac OS will claim is his favourite anyway so what difference does it make? God, NO ONE UNDERSTANDS ME!).
iOS: Having given iOS a major upgrade to its notification system in 2011, Apple will implement an even more startling upgrade in 2012: Pre-notifications. Using patented time-displacement technology, Apple will deliver pre-notifications for events that will be happening to you shortly, such as “Your brother will call you in 15 minutes”, “The milk in your refrigerator will go bad at 3:15 PM” and “Hear that clock tower chiming midnight? You’ll be dead by the time the bells stop. Make peace with whatever god(s) you worship”. Google will attempt to copy the feature by using the open-source ‘Magic 8-Ball’ system.
Hardware: Sexbots. I’ve long said that only Apple can deliver the kind of product quality and smooth user experience that will make this currently niche product category really take off, and I believe 2012 will be the year Apple makes it happen. (Well, belief and hope are often so mixed up that it’s hard to tell them apart. But why not 2013? Seriously, why not, Apple? Because if there’s some barrier you need our help overcoming, we’re all ears.)
Pie-in-the-sky wish: That’s it exactly. Pie…in the sky. Apple will launch a series of satellites to create an orbital pie-delivery system, eradicating world hunger by delivering fruit-filled goodness anywhere in the world. This will also set the company up for 2013 when it will deliver a shiny aluminium solution for obesity.
Andy Ihnatko, tech columnist, Chicago Sun-Times
Mac OS X: I predict a rollback of sorts on iCloud. Remember when Steve Jobs stood on stage and smiled sheepishly and admitted that the first-generation Apple TV was a dud? It won’t be as heavy as that. But there will be some movement that most people will interpret as an acknowledgment that iCloud wasn’t quite ready to go in 2011…and would everybody please treat iCloud in 2012 as if it were a brand-new thing, please?
iOS: We’ll see a less-expensive iPad. Apple almost has to do it, as 2012 will be the first year that the iPad will have any kind of serious competition. Amazon might ship a 10in Kindle Fire, but even if it doesn’t, there’s no doubt that the company will make enough improvements to the 7-inch Fire to turn it into a perceptible threat to the iPad. Meanwhile, Windows will appear on tablets of its own by late 2012. (I’ve used modern-day Windows tablets, and they’re quite nifty.) Apple has had the whole pool to itself for two years, but now the company is going to have to prove its mettle in an open marketplace.
On the other hand, I can’t picture Apple ever making a smaller iPad. Heck, I’m not even certain the company will be willing to drop the price on whatever the ‘current’ models is. At best, the company might cut the price in September for the holidays, and in anticipation of a serious hardware upgrade in early 2013. Otherwise, Apple will do what it’s done with the iPhone line: Release new hardware and keep last year’s model (meaning the current iPad) in stores at a reduced price.
Hardware: I predict that by Valentine’s Day, I will be sick of talking about Apple-branded TV rumours. I believe that I will be asked questions about such a product in March, and in April, and in May, and by mid-year I will have lost the will to even activate a mental keyboard macro and say the same things I’ve been saying for several months now (“As usual, never believe an Apple rumour until the company has actually released the thing. I don’t immediately understand why Apple would want to do a standalone TV instead of just enhancing the Apple TV box. I suppose the real swing of this idea is in licensing deals with networks and not with hardware, per se.”). I predict that I will lean forward, bury my face in my hands and exhale slowly; then smooth back my hair, rise back to meet the gaze of my questioner, and say “Sorry? I didn’t quite get that.”
Pie-in-the-sky wish: I’d like to see an explicit way to run full-screen Mac OS X apps on an iPad. It would use the Mac’s built-in Screen Sharing feature, with a little extra sophistication on the iPad side. Yeah, it’s a pipe dream to think that we’d ever get to run iOS apps on the Mac or vice-versa, but this would be a nice convenience for those many times when there’s just no adequate analog for a Mac app on the iPad.
Bonus predictions, because it’s Andy: I believe we’ll be seeing more of Sir Jony in 2012. Apple will find it difficult to let go of its self-image as an ‘auteur’ company, and as an institution, I think Apple gets a sense of security from the presence of That Guy Who Totally Gets It. We won’t see His Royal J-Ness taking up Steve Jobs’s public role, but he’ll do enough on-camera interviews with mainstream news programs and other shows that he’ll become the new face of Apple. Out with one legend, in with a new one.
I believe that before construction of the new Apple Spaceship campus gets fully underway, Tim Cook will be walking around the grounds of the former HP campus hunting rabbits. A shot will miss its mark, and then up from the ground will come a bubblin’ geyser of printer ink. He will then load up his beat-up old 2011 Mercedes SL5 AMG and move to Beverly Hills with his delectable niece and his doltish nephew.
Arnold Kim, founder and Senior Editor, MacRumors.com
Mac OS X: Retina-display support. Boom. No one’s actually ever seen one, but we just can’t stop thinking about a 300-dpi laptop screen. It’s so exciting because it would be something new in the Mac product line that’s not just an incremental improvement. Beyond that, I don’t think we’ll see much in the way of major OS X changes. Apple typically follows an every-other-year release cycle for the Mac OS and we just got Lion in 2011.
iOS: I said it last year, and I’ll say it again: Apple is working on some kind of massive custom-mapping solution for iOS. The pieces are in place already. Apple’s acquired companies, hired engineers, and basically said it’s working on mapping and traffic. I suppose this feature could be more than a year off, but mapping and directions remain one of the big discrepancies between Android and iPhone, so I think it has a high priority at Apple.
Hardware: I fear the poor Mac Pro is doomed. It’s not something I say lightly, as I’ve long been a Mac Pro user – nothing would make me happier than a killer desktop rig from Apple with a beautiful, new industrial design. And it seems just a few years ago that a redesigned Mac tower was the ultimate in drool-worthy rumour mongering. Now we all drool over a new iPhone, and I think Apple is well aware of that shift. The company isn’t one to cling to the past, and I think the time of the Mac tower is coming to a close.
Pie-in-the-sky-wish: A brand new Mac Pro with radically different industrial design and lower price tag. It will finally incorporate Thunderbolt, a few PCI slots, easy to open interior and a sub $2000 price tag. It will revitalise the Apple desktop market and show Apple’s commitment to professionals.
What are your Apple predictions for 2012? Let us know in the comments section below.